2006 Viewing
Starsky and Hutch on FX (December) -- Meh.  If I had known the original series
better (that inspired this big-screen remake), I might have found this movie
funnier.  I like Ben Stiller's parodies, but this movie seems too tame to be either
a parody or a comedy, really.  There are some grin-inducing moments, and
there are lots of nods to the '70s throughout (the costume, hair, set, and props
designers must have had a blast raiding thrift stores).  Sadly, the best
performance might be that of a non-actor: Snoop Dogg (as Huggy
Bear)--although Jason Bateman is not to be overlooked.  I recommend the
movie to lovers of the TV series, but it just doesn't stand on its own as a movie
for viewers without all the "insider" knowledge of the original.
The Rules of Attraction on IFC (November) -- "Nobody knows anyone else ever."  
These words of wisdom, bitterly slung by one aimless character at another,
encapsulate the spirit of the movie.  It's about college students with no hopes
for their university careers or lives thereafter, with no meaningful romantic
relationships or social interactions, with misplaced priorities and stereotypical
vices (drugs, alcohol, sex, violence), and with cynicism and angst as modes of
living.  It's the movie version of a
Bret Easton Ellis novel--which, if you know
anything about the author, should tell you a lot about the movie.  So I found
little about the characters or how they deal with their lots in life to draw me in.  
However, the
manner in which the movie tells their stories is interesting.  The
movie opens at the event that also ends the movie, setting us up for a
let's-back-up-and-show-you-how-we-got-to-this-point approach used throughout
the movie.  There's some very interesting camera work used, too--especially a
split-screen dialogue scene that resolves into a . . . well, it's too complicated to
explain, but quite interesting to watch.  I was drawn into the movie not by the
characters but by the storytelling approach of the movie makers.
Hairspray on TCM (November) -- Yet another John Waters, this one undoubtedly
the most accessible of the three I've seen recently [read below].  An
overweight Ricki Lake plays Tracy Turnblad, a teen who catapults to fame (well,
amongst Baltimore teens) by demonstrating her dancing prowess on a local
teen dance show.  She's also instrumental in the movement to integrate the
dance show (this is a segregated Baltimore in the early '60s), so racism is a
major player in the plot, too.  All this sparks jealousy, outrage, and revenge in
the heretofore unchallenged dance queen, a slender blonde whose popularity
satisfies her parents' desires.  Divine is considerably subtler in this movie and is
matched well by Jerry Stiller as her husband.  Debbie Harry, Sonny Bono, Ric
Ocasek, Ruth Brown, and Pia Zadora also appear in the movie.  It makes me all
the more interested to see
the musical version that hit Broadway a couple
years ago, as well as
the upcoming movie version (a movie based on a musical
based on a movie!) starring John Travolta as Tracy's mother!
All About My Mother on IFC (November) -- If you've seen the classic movie All
About Eve, you will have a hint about this movie, but only a hint.  It's promotional
material advertises the movie thus: "Manuela goes to Barcelona in search of
Lola, her son's father.  The search for a man with that name cannot be simple.  
And indeed it isn't."  It's complicated but compelling, and beautifully laid out.  
There are many layers to the story, all of which seem to connect to the central
idea of the capacity of women to act: on stage, to the public, with their loved
ones, with one another.  The main character, Manuela, is appealing and
sympathetic (and, evidently, an incidental character from a previous Pedro
Almodovar movie whose story he fleshed out to become this movie), as are the
other characters, frankly, even though they all do plenty things to make one
think less of them.  But they're human, and they're acting for reasons that seem
important to them.  Ultimately, though, they all make connections that last
despite (because of?) their acting.
High School Musical on Disney Channel (November) -- The Disney movie that
has become a national sensation (and, now, a touring production) enchanted
our children when they first watched it on TV, but Susan and I somehow never
got around to watching it until now.  We DVRed it and watched it with the girls to
see just what was the big deal.  I was cynical from the start, noting how
hopelessly cheerful and innocent the high school-aged characters were and
how unlikely the plot was.  But, come on: it's a musical, an art form that relies on
the willing suspension of disbelief (who really lives in a world in which people
spontaneously break into fully orchestrated songs and choreographed dance
numbers with whoever else happens to be nearby?).  Looking at it from my
daughters' eyes, it's a fun experience.  The characters really are typical high
schoolers in that they judge others by what groups they belong to/activities
they participate in, and in that they want their social order maintained (i.e.,
basketball players do
not audition for musicals; theatre kids do not participate in
science club).  There is romance, comedy, a little bit of drama, and a satisfying
ending.  There are lessons learned, too--by the kids themselves (and, thus, the
kids in the viewing audience) and by the adults who play a part in keeping the
separation of spheres in the high school alive.  And the title itself is clever; the
events surround the auditions for a high school musical ("musicale," as the
quirky director calls it), but the movie itself is a musical, too, about high school.  
The characters break into song and dance to express their feelings about high
school life.  I think I can see why it has been such a hit.
Y Tu Mama Tambien on IFC (November) -- Two spoiled, lazy Mexican teens take
an unhappily married woman on a road trip to the ocean.  Their adventures
include alcohol, drugs, sex, and confessions and experiments that ultimately
tear their friendship apart.  The movie's style is interesting, and there seems to
be a bigger message than just, "Behave as teenagers, because a carefree
lifestyle will hurt you in the end."  There are parallels and juxtapositions with
Mexican political and social events.  I was eager to see it after having heard
good things about it.  It was good exercise for my eyes as I moved rapidly back
and forth from the subtitles to the images throughout the entire movie!
But I'm a Cheerleader on IFC (November) -- A teenager thinks she's living a happy
life as a stereotypical pretty cheerleader with a cute athletic boyfriend and
upcoming cheerleader meetings to plan for the "big game."  That is, until she
comes home one day to an intervention; her friends and family thinks she's
gay, and they're sending her to a "rehabilitation camp" to "turn her straight."  
Cathy Moriarty is funny as the strict headmistress of the camp, pressing
everyone to confess his/her homosexuality and drilling them in their proper
gender roles (girls learn to scrub the floor and change diapers, boys learn to
change the oil on the car and play football).  Eddie Cibrian is queeny as her
muscular son whose latent tendencies drive her nuts (e.g., she yells at him for
sipping his juice through a straw rather than chugging it like a man).  The other
actors are fine, but the characters are too broad and the stereotypes too
obvious.  Toward the movie's end, I was fast forwarding large chunks and
wondering what the movie makers' overall purpose was.
Polyester on IFC (November) -- Another John Waters film, this one considerably
more watchable . . . but still laughable.  Drag queen Divine plays a suburban
housewife who is much put upon by life.  Her adulterous husband shocks her
morality and scandalizes the town by running a porn movie theater, her mother
is a judgmental shrew, her daughter is an unabashed whore, and her son is a
sociopathic drug user who stomps women's feet for pleasure (his, not theirs).  
Even the encouragement of her mildly retarded, overweight, orthodontically
challenged, filthy rich friend isn't enough to keep her from descending into
alcoholism after her husband and children abandon her.  And just as things are
starting to look up for toward the movie's end, she is betrayed again.  What's
the message about mid-20th century suburban life? about domestic life in
America? about polyester in general?  Who knows.  It's another exercise in
making movie viewers uncomfortable, although the discomfort comes mainly
over the poor acting and storytelling and not over the jarring images and
situations.
Female Trouble on IFC (October) -- Wow, is this movie bad.  I DVRed it because it
was a John Waters film I hadn't seen, so I thought I'd try it out.  The acting, the
technical aspects, the writing--all are so unfathomably bad that, to enjoy this
movie, one has to be a lover of cult classics, a student of John Waters' oeuvre,
or a masochist.  Or maybe some of each.  Its characters have no redeeming
values whatsoever and resemble no plausible people on this planet, nor do they
experience events that any viewer is likely to connect with or learn from.  Okay,
so it's unrealistic.  Is it compelling?  No.  Is it funny?  No.  Is it
thought-provoking?  No, it's repellent.  However, John Waters' goal in his
movies was to shock and inspire discomfort and, in so doing, cause the viewer
to react and feel.  Meh.  This one is laughable.  (But it's not stopping me from
DVRing some other Waters films . . .)
Barnyard in theaters (August) -- Part of our celebration of Abigail's 7th birthday
was a family viewing of this movie, about which I really knew nothing before
going to it.  It was pretty cute!  The premise is that barnyard animals are
bipedal party animals whenever humans aren't looking.  Ben is the responsible
cow who keeps watch over the barnyard (on the lookout for the carnivorous
coyotes) while everyone else has fun, including his adopted son Otis, the teen
cow who resists Ben's efforts to groom Otis to take over his "watchcow" duties.  
There are lots of visual and verbal puns and lots of silliness, including a scene in
which a delinquent boy delights in going "cow tipping," only to become a victim
himself of "kid tipping" when the cows hotwire a car and seek revenge.  There is
also tragedy and scariness and, in the end, love, triumph, and important life
lessons learned.  The girls REALLY enjoyed it, and so did Susan and I.
Atlantis: The Lost Empire on VHS (July) -- My daughters checked this video out
from the public library and invited me to watch it with them.  I was struck by the
great effects--a Disney animated feature that feels like a live-action one with
great camera angles and special effects.  There are WAY too many supporting
characters for any of them to get adequate screen time, however.  Otherwise, it
was fun to imagine the lost world of Atlantis and to "get into" this movie's
mythology.  It was especially fun to do it alongside my daughters and to see it
from their perspective (e.g., what's merely action to me is "a scary part" to
them).
Superman Returns in theaters (June) -- I have vague recollections of having seen
the Christopher Reeve movies, and it seems to me that this one is pretty true to
the franchise--right down to the font used for the opening credits!  Susan's dad
agreed to watch the girls while she and I went to the movie, which I wanted to
see mostly because of its being a super hero movie, not because of my being a
Superman fan in particular.  It was good.  The special effects are really good,
especially in comparison to the original movies (I'm thinking of how realistic
Superman's flying looks this time around).  I like the acting, too.  Kevin Spacey
makes a good Lex Luthor, and Parker Posey is appropriate for her role,
although it's the same one she seems always to play in every movie.  I also like
Brandon Routh as Clark/Superman.
X-Men III: The Last Stand in theaters (June) -- My wife and I joined several of our
friends for a child-free night at the movies and out for a drink and appetizers
afterward.  We had seen the first two movies in this franchise, so I was able to
understand where this one picks up with the overall plot and the characters'
situations.  I never read the
X-Men comics, so I'm not familiar with the
"mythology" except as I know it from the previous movies.  No matter--I enjoy
meeting new mutants (well, new to me) in each movie, and this one was no
exception.  One of the saddest things I've ever seen in a movie was the scene
in which a young boy, ashamed of his being a mutant, hides in the bathroom
from his dad and tries to saw off the feathered wings growing from his back.  
My wife liked the movie, too, but mainly because of its featuring Hugh Jackman!
Over the Hedge in theaters (June) -- As a last-day-of-school treat, Susan and I
took the girls to a matinee of this very funny Dreamworks film about a group of
animals who wake up from hibernation to find their chunk of nature surrounded
by a newly sprung-up housing development.  Though their traditional sources of
food are now limited, they discover an abundance of food in the homes that
have encroached on their land.  Soon it's a battle between the animals, who try
to sneak food and supplies from the humans, and the humans, who want to rid
their neighborhood of these pests.  Things are complicated by the fact that one
of the animals is withholding his
real reason for pressuring the others into
stealing from the humans and by the increasingly intense efforts of two humans
in particular to eradicate the animals.  A cute variety of characters, serious
messages beneath the adventures on the surface, tense moments, comic
moments, great voice work by famous actors--a great afternoon in the movie
theater.
The Big Lebowski on DVD (March) -- A student loaned me this DVD, which I have
had for a long, long time and finally got around to watching this weekend with
Susan.  It's an odd movie with many humorous moments but ultimately nothing
to latch onto.  All the characters are really just "characters" and not people;
they're defined entirely by their quirks, not by any realistic qualities with which
a viewer might connect.  Thus, I don't care about their dilemmas or whether
they achieve their goals.  I cannot invest in them emotionally because they're
too cartoonish.  That said, I enjoyed some of the comic performance choices
made by John Goodman and Jeff Bridges and Philip Seymour Hoffman; and
Julianne Moore was compelling and somehow did manage to make her weird
character seem somewhat realistic.  I felt bombarded by the profanity,
though--yet another way in which the movie kept me at a distance.  Some might
call that Postmodern, but I just call it a good reason not to have spent any
money renting this DVD.
Nanny McPhee in theaters (February) -- Awesome!  So good that we bought the
Nurse Matilda books upon which the movie is based.  Read more about our
viewing experience
here.
2006 Reading
My Secret by Frank Warren (December) -- Read my reactions here.
Live from New York by Tom Shales and James Andrew Miller (August) -- I
borrowed this book from my brother- and sister-in-law.  While visiting them last
month, I saw this book on their shelf and picked it up out of curiosity.  The cover
said that it was "an uncensored history of
Saturday Night Live," a show that I've
enjoyed watching from time to time throughout the years.  It's a collection of
excerpts from interviews with a multitude of people associated with the show
since its inception.  The authors do very little editorializing; mostly, they present
the interviewees' own words and let them tell the story of the show.  Writers,
producers, television network executives, cast members, hosts--all have their
say and share anecdotes both complimentary and critical.  Because I'm not a
die-hard fan, I was surprised how engaging I found the book to be.  I especially
enjoyed following topics from one person's perspective to another's (e.g., to
what everybody attributes the show's longevity and periods of popularity).  At
over 650 pages, it was a surprisingly quick read, too.
The Prydain Chronicles: The Book of Three by Lloyd Alexander (July) -- Suzanna
came home from the library with several books to read, and I had nothing lying
around to read myself, so I grabbed this one from her pile to browse.  I ended
up reading the entire thing in no time.  It's a fantasy novel for children (a few
Web sites show its being read by middle school classes), and Susan
remembers having read all the books of
The Prydain Chronicles when she herself
was young.  
The Book of Three features an appealing young protagonist on a
search for an oracular pig named Hen while on the run from a warrior with
horns coming out of his head (it all really does make sense once one has begun
reading).  The characters are varied, the dangers are frequent and serious, and
the potential for further adventures is apparent at the close of the novel.
Pedro's Journal: A Voyage with Christopher Columbus, August 3, 1492-February 14, 1493
by Pam Conrad (July) -- This work of historical fiction is told from the
perspective of a young boy aboard the Santa Maria with Christopher Columbus
as he makes his first voyage across the Atlantic Ocean for India . . . and
"discovers" the islands of the Caribbean Sea.  Suzanna checked it out to read,
and I like historical fiction, so I asked if I could read it when she was done.  It
made me crack open the encyclopedia to read up on Columbus and his four
voyages to the New World, a topic I'm sure I studied in school but about which
I remembered very little until now.  Conrad writes from Pedro's perspective
and creates in him a Spaniard who is aghast at some of the things Columbus
and his crew do to the natives they encounter on the islands of the Caribbean.  
This suits a modern historical approach that acknowledges the importance of
Columbus' voyage(s) but that also admits the abuses suffered by the peoples
whom European explorers encountered and considered subordinate, suitable
for enslavement and worse.  It's fun to read the same book that my daughter
has read and, afterward, to discuss our impressions of it.  ("Dad, did you get to
the part with [fill in the blank] yet?  Okay, I won't say anything about it, then.")
Results Now: How We Can Achieve Unprecedented Improvements in Teaching and
Learning by Mike Schmoker (July) -- The "now" of the title reflects the author's
sense of urgency about educators and educational leaders' putting into place
immediately the suggestions that he offers for improving students' learning.  
Some of the things that Schmoker is adamant about changing right away:
increasing the amount of reading, writing, and discussion happening in
classrooms at every grade level in every subject area; eliminating the isolation
that keeps individual teachers from communicating with colleagues and, thus,
from sharing and learning best practices with/from one another; implementing
professional learning communities in which teachers collaborate often and
regularly to plan curriculum, perfect lesson plans, write assessments, examine
assessment results, and make changes accordingly to what and how they're
teaching; and refocus school leaders' main role from that of bureaucrat or even
instructional leader to that of
learning leader.  He's a critic of traditional staff
development that relies on external experts to make presentations to the staff
because so rarely does it ever require teachers to make use of the presented
information . . . so it rarely ever makes any difference in teachers' teaching or
students' learning.  Schmoker believes that most faculties already possess all
the knowledge necessary to implement the changes above without delay.  
Improved student learning is his main concern, and that can't afford to wait any
longer.  It's an inspiring book, but its intended audience--teachers and
educational leaders themselves--must first be convinced that it applies to
them,
too.  So many regional schools feel that they're doing just fine as it is;
community members are happy with their schools, standardized test scores
are better than schools in other states, etc.  I can imagine many educators
reacting to this book with a "yes, this is what other schools need to do to
improve" attitude.
A Series of Unfortunate Events -- Book the Twelfth: The Penultimate Peril by Lemony
Snicket (July) -- I began the book with the hope that good things just might be
about to happen, finally, to/for the Baudelaire orphans.  Alack and alas, no.  The
book brings back a plethora of characters, both good and evil, from previous
installments in the series.  Their ineptitude, either at being noble or at being
nefarious, lends humor to the children's otherwise horrible misfortunes, as
does the author's writing style, so self-aware and filled with puns and language
play that of course I am bound to enjoy it.  The children still are struggling with
the question of their own moral character and how to live with themselves
when they must do ignoble things in order to achieve noble goals (such as their
own survival, for example).  The book ends with them back in the clutches of
evil Count Olaf, their nemesis throughout the series.  This time, however, they
have purposely put themselves in this situation, and I cannot help but hope (I
know, I know, what good has optimism done me thus far?) that time,
experience, and maturity have equipped the children with the necessary
mental skills to outwit this bad guy once and for all in the next (and ultimate)
book.
1776 by David McCullough (June) -- It's not really like me to choose a work of
history for pleasure reading, but I had read such good things about this book
last summer that I asked for it and received it as a gift.  Only this summer did I
have time to start it, and I read it in only a few days.  It is the story of General
George Washington and the trials and tribulations he faces during 1776: turning
a rag-tag assembly of half-heartedly committed volunteer militiamen into a
true Continental Army, proving himself as a military strategist and leader,
surviving defeats at the hands of the better trained, better armed, better
staffed, and more experienced British army and navy.  Of course I knew all
along how it (the war) would turn out, but I don't remember enough from
studying the Revolutionary War in school to recall specific battles, so I was
tense reading about Washington and his men fighting at Boston or New York
City or Trenton, wondering how each battle would turn out and getting alarmed
as they lost a series of important battles to the British.  This book also got me
thinking about the Tories or Loyalists, people who must have felt they, not "the
rebels," were on the right side in maintaining their allegiance to the King.  After
all, they had been born and raised British subjects, and they were enjoying
prosperity in the British colonies.  I remember thinking of them as "bad guys"
when studying history in school, but it's all a matter of perspective, I suppose.  
McCullough does a great job amalgamating information from a plethora of
sources into one very engaging narrative about one year in the war for one
remarkable patriot.
Specimen Days by Michael Cunningham (June) -- What an unusual concept for a
novel: three novellas, each featuring different versions of the same three
characters (one of whom experiences three different versions of traumatic
motherhood), each set in New York City (of the past, present, and then the
future), each with a character who quotes the poetry of Walt Whitman (and one
with an actual appearance by Walt himself!), and each including an infamous
building and a strangely decorated bowl.  Very engaging and, in places,
shocking.  I enjoyed seeing the characters evolve over time (from one third of
the book to the next section) into new variations of themselves, always with
certain consistent characteristics yet distinctly changed and well suited to the
new time period and context.  It would be interesting to read this novel
alongside Whitman's
Leaves of Grass in a course to see how one work informs
one's reading of the other.
The Last Cato by Matilde Asensi (June) -- Is "religious adventure" a literary
genre?  Just as
The Da Vinci Code had me pondering the veracity of its claims
about the Catholic church while following its characters on a
race-against-the-clock, life-or-death adventure around the world, so, too, did
The Last Cato, albeit with many, many more moments of, "Okay, wait just a
minute here . . ."  The main character is a nun who works for the Vatican's
archives, is the daughter of a maternally run Italian mafia family, goes on a
worldwide adventure with a Swiss Guardsman and a scholar of mixed ethnic
background (with whom she falls in love and for whom she renounces her
religious vows), and unwittingly joins a top-secret, centuries-old society whose
mission it is to steal and protect the remnants of what is believed to be the
cross of Jesus Christ.  The tests she and her partners must pass to join this sect
reminded me of those used at the end of each
Cliffhangers episode on TV in the
'80s: impossible for someone to have concocted and constructed, impossible for
mere mortals to escape, yet never, it seems, a match for the wits of our intrepid
heroes and heroines, who must rely on a copy of Dante's
Inferno to unravel the
clues therein and, in so doing, solve the puzzles that constitute each test along
their path to initiation.  If you're willing to suspend your disbelief enough, it's
actually kind of fun.